Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Neocon's Seminar Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (544)	5/9/2001 8:38:56 PM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 1112

I misread the article. Speciation supports natural selection.

To: gao seng who wrote (544)	5/10/2001 2:21:12 AM
From: Mitch Blevins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1112

But, I do not think that your examples are accepted by science. They newest exampe is 1991. Actually 6 of the articles were from 1992, which shows that I was using a dated source. I'll take your objection as a challenge to find more recent reports: January, 1999 RAPID HYBRID SPECIATION IN WILD SUNFLOWERS: EVIDENCE FROM GENETIC MAPPING MARK C. UNGERER, Stuart J. E. Baird, Jean Pan, Loren H. Rieseberg Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA intl-pag.org 9/28/97 Evidence for homoploid hybrid speciation in Encelia (Asteraceae: Heliantheae) csupomona.edu Of course the most recent example I can find is the article you just posted to me. :) I'm sure that we will still have much to debate even once the question of whether speciation exists is put to bed. Can you please concede now so that we can move on? I know! Let's talk about politics! ;-)