Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76745)	5/10/2001 7:59:09 AM
From: Robert New	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

I am more constructive now than ever and rather than see distribution that you speak of see much accumulation in the markets. The dips are shallow and on extremely light volume. That being said I do anticipate some "sell on the news" after the Fed event however plan to accumulate on that dip. The volume trends are VERY constructive from my vantage point and will continue to invest as such until this trend changes. I do also think we are leading up to a major move in the markets and think that move will be to the upside. However there will likely be headfakes as we often see. Many will miss out on this move out of the 2200-2250 area...

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76745)	5/10/2001 9:24:56 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Respond to of 99985

Zeev, the key is the value of the dollar. Dollar index around 100 is a critical range. Money will leave US investments if this range is broken to the downside. Until this level is not breached flow will be positive into US dollar and as a result into US assets. Haim

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76745)	5/10/2001 11:29:01 AM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

Why not let individuals decide what they will do with tax cuts instead of directing them? You seem to think that cutting taxes means to add capacity. Why would an individual like a company do that if they had plenty of capacity? They wouldn't. They'd use the tax not taken to add to efficiency of the capacity they had in place. What you suggest, directing tax money to final demand, marginalizes the incentive for producers to increase efficiency. The result is that the cost to produce the marginal unit does not fall so that an increase in final demand leads to a rise in prices or declining profits.