Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (144354)	5/10/2001 12:35:55 PM
From: nealm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Which one? [eom]

To: Scumbria who wrote (144354)	5/10/2001 12:48:36 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Respond to of 769667

You claim this violation of Constitutional rights and also that the election was fraudulent. Who exactly are you accusing of treason or subversion of the Constitution? What court adjudicated this and reached these conclusions? There were rulings on Clinton and that is fact. The rest is opinion, not proof and will only be fodder for historians to write and re-write over the next decade (accounting for short attention spans I can't believe this will carry far into the century<g>) Did you find the interest free debt idea interesting? It was good to see a decent span of history behind it and not just some "common sense" approach or a "social engineering" agenda as credence.