Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (8258)	5/10/2001 6:06:00 PM
From: RON BL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59480

I agree with you on most of what you said. These leaders on both sides are quite the lot. I really dont think that most people really cared that Clinton was having sex. It was that he was the leader of a militant group that said any leader having sex with a subordinate should be fired. This was what pissed most people off. The double standard. When I asked you the question were you for sterilizing the women it was a decent question. I am not for the government deciding who should be sterilized or not as in China. However I am not for subsidizing these women nor providing them free medical care not raising their mentally retarded group of children. If this wasn't the case these women would not be breeding babies. When the government says it will reward these people with a check then you get the sorry lot that they produce. Sorry if that sounds harsh but it appears to be reality. Strangely liberals today will go on and on about the glories of China but they subsidize the mass breeding of the illiterate in this country for political gain. It is my experience in the technical fields that the highly intelligent Asian and white women are not having children. Their to busy trying to pay their taxes overworked and can't fathom how they can raise a child. Meanwhile the low iq'ed people never give it a thought but run to Big Brother for all the goodies. Funny how so many liberals say they believe in evolution and reject the notion of God but then want to play God . How can anyone justify paying 50k a day for a crack addicted baby ? 50k would feed thousands in other countries who are starving. The morality of the question is immense and it seems to me that if one says we must morally pay 50 k a day to keep a crack addicted baby alive but other people are starving then the case is being made that this one baby being rescued by miracle means is causing the death of many in other parts of the world. Or is it just government mandated job security for doctors and hospitals ? Not an easy issue is it ?