Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (144561)	5/11/2001 6:47:08 AM
From: JDN	Respond to of 769670

Dear Thomas: disgraced ex-president Well, they got that right!! JDN

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (144561)	5/11/2001 9:38:07 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

Report: Bush Would Win Recount of Disputed Ballots yahoo.com Friday May 11 3:12 AM ET WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) would have won a hand recount of all disputed ballots in Florida's presidential election using the two most common standards for judging votes, according to a USA Today analysis published on Friday. The newspaper said the study of 171,908 ballots also found that errors by Democratic voters probably cost former Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) as many as 25,000 votes, enough to have decisively won Florida and the 2000 election. The findings were the result of a study of the state's disputed ballots by USA Today, The Miami Herald, Knight Ridder newspapers and six other Florida newspapers. The study found that Gore might have won a narrow victory if lenient standards that counted every mark on a ballot had been used, the newspaper said. But Gore could not have won without a hand count of overvote ballots, which he did not request, the report said. Bush won the state's crucial 25 Electoral College (news - web sites) votes only after a ferocious court battle with Gore that was ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites). The divided high court halted hand recounts that Gore had hoped would produce enough votes to overturn Bush's 537-vote margin of victory. The study analyzed 60,647 undervotes -- ballots that registered no vote in vote-counting machines. It also examined 111,261 overvotes -- ballots marked with more than one presidential choice. Under Florida law, overvotes are disqualified. USA Today said the study found that Democratic voters made far more overvotes than Republican voters. ``Gore would likely have won if all overvote ballots had been properly marked,'' said Anthony Salvanto, a political scientist at the University of California-Irvine who assisted the news organizations on the study. He said people who cast overvotes were clearly confused by the presidential portion of the Florida ballot and had few problems casting votes in other races. The paper said voters were confused by a long list of minority-party presidential candidates on the ballot. USA Today said only 6 percent of those who overvoted in the presidential race made the same mistake in the Senate race, which was next on the ballot. He concluded that the leading causes of overvotes in Florida were ballot design and ballot wording. USA Today said Florida's controversial ``butterfly'' ballot was a key problem for many voters. The ballot put candidates' names on facing pages with punch holes in the middle. The alignment confused some voters, who punched holes for candidates they did not intend to choose. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president's younger brother, signed a sweeping election reform law on Wednesday that ended the use of butterfly ballots and punch-card machines in the state. The governor signed the reform measure in Palm Beach County, where Gore supporters believe the butterfly ballot cost their candidate the presidency.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (144561)	5/11/2001 12:39:21 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Clinton's advice that the U.S. should be more concilliatory towards China comes in the wake of President Bush's decision to reverse his own administration's eight year moratorium on arms sales to Taiwan in the face of Beijing's repeated threats of invasion -- and even nuclear attack on the U.S. if it interferes. Really now. I remember China's threatening to nuke us-- proof that it is no partner-- not even close. Now Taiwan is a partner, and I think we should do more to support her. We should give her the Aegis destroyers she wants. Moreover, Bush should not have rescinded his remark re: his willing to fight for Taiwan if need be.