Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (136863)	5/11/2001 4:06:41 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580442

The evidence that I have seen hints to more likely tampering by the Democrats then Republicans, but considering the potentially biased sources I haven't made a big deal about it. The Gore/Buchanan double punches with proper Senate votes might easily mean that the part of the ballot dealing with congressional elections was less confuseing or that the people making the double punches figured out the problem after making the presidential vote (which was first on the ballot), but where too lazy or stupid or careless to do anything about it. Perhaps they thought the second punch would somhow undo the first or they thought they had spoiled the presidential vote and that it was too late to change it. Its really weak as evidence of fraud, esp. because the district where most of these butterfly ballot problems happened was controled by Democrats. You have any other evidence to support your contention of fraud? Tim