SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (46611)5/11/2001 5:19:40 PM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 70976
 
OT The greater question on the minimum wage IMHO is whether it benefits the wage earner or just inflates cost and becomes a zero sum game.



To: TimF who wrote (46611)5/11/2001 5:33:39 PM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
OT

>>Most minimum wage earners do not fully support themselves or anyone else with the money from the minimum wage job.<<

Do you have statistics for that assertion?

Drive through any affluent suburb on a weekday. You'll see plenty of landscape crews and plenty of maid service vans, all populated by adults (the kids are in school) working full-time minimum wage jobs. Lots of minimum wage adults work all night cleaning offices, too.

That nice saccharin phrase, "working poor" includes lots of people who work two or more minimum wage jobs doing back-breaking physical labor and still don't earn enough to feed and house themselves and their families.

Katherine



To: TimF who wrote (46611)5/11/2001 6:22:15 PM
From: Cary Salsberg  Respond to of 70976
 
OT

In the post you quoted from, I was advocating government assistance to supplement wages earned. I agree that the economic value of the minimum wage job will not support life's minimum requirements, but maybe it could qualify the wage earner for government assisted low cost or no cost health plans.