SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/11/2001 6:50:29 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<Any money that the middle class gets from Bush's tax cut will be spent on their gasoline and electricity bills!!!>>

I believe that is just what Bush said. Tax cut to help pay fuel bills so overall spending wouldn't be hurt. Now I know you will reply with some dumb shit thing about the tax cuts just off setting the fuel costs. And yep, that's the idea.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/11/2001 6:51:50 PM
From: Mana  Respond to of 769670
 
Patricia,
Your delusional.

-Mana



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/11/2001 6:53:22 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 769670
 
Pat,

Bush should not waste money on the paper work and give the money directly to his campaign contributors in the oil and energy bizness.

Exactly.

Scumbria



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/11/2001 6:56:43 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
GREENS VOTE TO BOYCOTT OIL COMPANIES
WE USED TO CALL THESE PEOPLE "REDS"

By: Alan Caruba
etherzone.com

On April 23rd, the Global Greens 2001 Conference, meeting in Canberra, Australia and composed of representatives from more than 70 nations, endorsed a boycott of Exxon-Mobil, Texaco, and Chevron corporations "due to their activities on global warming issues."
"The goal of the boycott is to pressure President Bush to rejoin the Kyoto Treaty and begin implementing steps in the United States to reverse global warming", said a communique from the Association of State Green Parties. Never mind that their hero, Bill Clinton, never sent the treaty to the Senate for a vote during his eight years in office. Or that the Senate had unanimously approved a resolution saying it would never ratify the treaty.

The Greens, of course, are totally opposed to the drilling for new supplies of oil in "Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and other environmentally sensitive areas." One can safely assume that your backyard is an environmentally sensitive area as well.

One can also assume that, as the price of a gallon of gasoline hits $3 this summer, a lot of Americans are going to be thinking long and hard about the ways the Green agenda has sought to thwart every effort to increase the supply of gas and oil. It is not the fault of the oil companies. They are in business to provide it. It isn't even the fault of OPEC nations. They are in business to sell it. It is, however, totally consistent with the opposition to the use of this "fossil fuel" that has been a central, abiding issue among Greens. (Read "The World has More Oil, Not Less" on this site.)

The mantra of the Greens is that "The US with four percent of the world's population uses about 25 percent of the world's energy resources." Well, sure we do! That's because the United States is a dynamo producing more food to feed ours and the world's population, more innovative technology to increase and improve communications, transportation, new medical techniques and pharmaceuticals, and a host of other life-enhancing devices than the imagination can grasp.

Americans work together as a team and we generally compete more effectively than everyone else. We are a people on the move, not a people who break for a siesta or who take three-hour lunches in a Paris bistro to discuss Marxist theory. In our spare time, we volunteer our time and our money to every worthy cause you can name. And we do this while our government taxes nearly half of our earnings.

These deluded Luddites are, presumably, now not filling up their car's gas tanks with the products of these three oil companies, adding their oil to their car engines, nor heating their homes or offices with the oil they refine.

"This boycott shall continue until the United States Government takes substantial and concrete steps towards both the dramatic reduction of Greenhouse Gas emissions and Global Treaties to ensure greenhouse gas emissions are dramatically lowered."

Has anyone told these idiots that a major greenhouse gas is water vapor?

The problem with the Greens is not just that they are deliberately stupid, but that their posturing and programs would harm the lone bastion of liberty in the world. As to the representatives of the other 70+ nations attending the Global Greens 2001 Conference, their boycott no doubt did not include the jet fuel used to fly them back home. The Greens who grandly announced this boycott are hypocrites.

You can thank the Greens for the energy crisis being experienced in California and which might spread to other US States.

They have fought every effort to explore for and extract new sources of oil.

They have opposed the construction of new refineries and new pipelines.

They have opposed the construction of new plants to generate electrical energy.

They have advocated the destruction of dams that generate hydroelectricity.

They have opposed the construction of new transmission lines.

They have thwarted the development of new coal mining operations.

They have opposed the building of new nuclear energy facilities.

We used to call these people "Reds". Now we call them "Greens".



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/11/2001 7:43:49 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 769670
 


Any money that the middle class gets from Bush's tax cut will be spent on their gasoline and electricity bills!!!
Bush should not waste money on the paper work and give the money directly to his campaign contributors in the oil and energy
bizness.


Normally I'm for efficiency but all that money circulating through the economy is what makes capitalism work so I don't think it's a good idea to donate directly.;)

BTW is Scumbria correct? A good liberal like Gloria Allred would kick his ass for this mindset.


Many women say no, when they mean yes.

It is a fundamental property of their sex.

Scumbria



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (144740)5/12/2001 1:27:12 AM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Pat, I'm interested in whatever reaction you may have to Scumbria posts 144713 and 144721.