Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Neocon's Seminar Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mitch Blevins who wrote (589)	5/12/2001 1:15:44 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1112

What utter nonsense. Dembski stresses that design can not be used as a default result. Perhaps you need to reread origins.org

To: Mitch Blevins who wrote (589)	5/12/2001 12:11:03 PM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 1112

You may use poorly designed analogies to explain weakness of Dembski's theories. But the only valid criticism of his work that I have seen does not say that the explanatory filter is inherently flawed, but that the aberrations from randomness detected are to be expected due to the complexity of the universe. I would think that to be a starting point on a discussion of his work. And I still think your test is rigged. If not a then b. Put in a none of the above and an all of the above and you may successfully pass it through your bullshit detector.