Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: multicollinearity who wrote (72663)	5/12/2001 2:52:19 PM
From: SBHX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

multico, I have a lot to learn from you and all the other people in this thread. Please don't stop posting and contribute your thoughts on the topic of this very dramatic episode for a company called rambus. I find all your posts to be deep and insightful, and I yearn for more of the same from you. SbH

To: multicollinearity who wrote (72663)	5/12/2001 5:25:48 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

I put B & S on ignore a long time ago. It has saved me a great deal of time. These are the same BS guys that were proclaiming the death of RDRAM after Caminogate more than a year ago. RDRAM is growing stronger with each passing day. DDR has remained a graphics niche product. SDRAM is on its way out. Now they are proclaim the death of Rambus after getting a verdict on one highly questionable charge out more than 50 charges. Nothing is new. A year from now Rambus will be more than twice as strong as it is today.

To: multicollinearity who wrote (72663)	5/12/2001 5:56:25 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

"Good to see that there are still some rational thinkers lurking out there. The board has been over taken by Bilow-wannabes. Longs have been quite silent, probably realizing one can't carry on an intelligent discussion with a wall." I agree..... however, I would replace 'wall', with 'broken distorted record'. Ö¿Ö

To: multicollinearity who wrote (72663)	5/12/2001 6:47:24 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Multi... RE:"Jim, <You do not know much about royalty agreements.> I think you misplaced the period. It should go after the first five words (g). Multico P.S. Good to see that there are still some rational thinkers lurking out there. The board has been over taken by Bilow-wannabes. Longs have been quite silent, probably realizing one can't carry on an intelligent discussion with a wall." Good to see there are still some suckers out there. How in the world can you so blind? Longs are silent because they have gotten their arses kicked, siliconinvestor.com