SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude Cormier who wrote (982)5/14/2001 12:13:09 PM
From: geoffb_si  Respond to of 4051
 
Claude:

Not sure on drilling. 3 weeks back, I was told end of May. A week ago, I was told end of May was a little aggressive. The delay, I was told, was because of the realization that E1 was in fact 2 anomalies (E1-South and E1-North), and they were in the process of refining E1-North (geochem. sampling).

As well, they may be giving majors a chance to review data, to see if they get an offer they can't refuse...

Geoff



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (982)5/14/2001 3:40:27 PM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4051
 
Considering risk vs. reward, PLY appears one of the best bets on the board.

The graph in their last NR appears to indicate a deposit dipping to the east. This would also be consistent with their E.M. anomaly as the geochem anomaly is located on the east flank of it. E.M. anomalies often indicate granite/granodiorite intrusives which generally are found in association with base metal deposits in this area.

An idea of what PLY's deposit might look like can be found on their website. Look at the Conception del Oro deposit in the top left corner of deposit models for the area at playfairmining.com

If anyone can find another reason for the high metals content in soils discovered by geochem, I'd really like to hear it. I've been trying to find the flaw with this project for past several months but failed. However, I'm not the brightest gem in the box.

Bob