SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (134854)5/14/2001 1:28:08 PM
From: Robert Salasidis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
MIPS has all but died in anything but embedded computing. They could not keep up with Alpha at one time (were dropped by MS for WinNT support al long time ago because of lack of volume of sales). Subsequently the low/mid end of the server market was also taken away by Intel chips. They then turned their attention to embedded designs where PowerPC and ARM are dominant (I should reverse that order). Their 64 bit designs helped them differentiate themselves from the above two (I believe the Nintendo 64 was a MIPS based design).

The requirements of embedded CPUs are completely different from desktop/server requirements, and there is basivally little crossover of individual chips (but not necessarily architectures) between the two camps.



To: Scumbria who wrote (134854)5/14/2001 5:09:32 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "Good thing that nobody is using MIPS cores in any products."

SGI - former OWNER of MIPS - is now designing Pentium/Xeon and ITanium chips into their systems.

MIPS is now just a low level, low profit embedded processor.

Paul