SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ralfph who wrote (677)5/15/2001 3:44:37 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 8273
 
All good questions, and we can only guess at the answers ... however the value is there, and i like that a lot ... seems to me a good chance that random buying alone could take the thing to say sixty per cent of asset value, above a loonie, and that would be a fifty per cent return on speculation from the current price ... qbx did have something of a run last year, a triple roughly from right around the current level ... however much of the asset value at the time was based on ephemera like ltg.v, whose tanking had effect on qbx shareprice far beyond its effect on qbx NAV ... imho ... but this time around it's more real - more hard cash, and the majority of the rest in the oilpatch, and rising

Hard to say ... i'm just playing the odds ... seems like they could come up with a story any time ... and it would take very little 'gentle guidance' to double the shareprice ... hey, if they just did a 2m buyback each year at ~.60, then ran it to say 1.50 and fed that paper out, they could send us nickel-a-share cheques as dividends -g-

dy.to - anybody follow this one? ... had news out today ... contract miners who take chunks of equity in projects as well ... phnpi but has had at times, and likely will again ... in their annual reports the customer list is impressive

cpt.v - when we gonna get some freakin financials for cpt and segb????! ... 'aprilish' feeling more stretched by the day, lol