Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (102459)	5/15/2001 10:09:43 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Seriously, I can't see that far ahead ... not sure anybody can. But while fuel remains that can burned or some other way be converted to electricity, central station power will likely be cost-effective -- If it isn't and something comes along that can provide our energy needs without such economies of scale -- well, that would really be transforming -- but I think it isn't likely. I've heard estimates that say we have at least 150 - 200 years worth of coal left including growth in consumption. I think for oil and nat gas the estimates are 50 - 75 years. Scarcity and higher prices will inspire someone -- Regarding our current electric system: were our ancestors wrong in leaving us this legacy? I'm so glad they did, aren't you? It's not perfect, but I like living this way better than the way my Amish neighbors live ...