Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Reaper who wrote (99228)	5/16/2001 12:15:41 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 152472

They will have 3G WCDMA....... it just might not be mobile wireless. OOF :- I can't help but feel that if CDMA 2000 had a similar or even lesser problem that these same analysts would be falling all over themselves to declare QCOM & CDMA 2000 dead meat. Ö¿Ö

To: The Reaper who wrote (99228)	5/16/2001 9:43:29 AM
From: voop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

This story is better than any novel I've ever read. No kidding. Not sure if it is a novel or a soap opera. International political intrigue, innuendo, cabals, in-fighting, fudmeisters, villians, heros, greed, power, willful deceit. Needs more sex, however. Voop

To: The Reaper who wrote (99228)	5/16/2001 2:39:00 PM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

It's called "synchronization". Can't do mobile without it. I am trying to comprehend what you mean? Are you saying that asynchronous just will not work for mobile? Or at least not with the current components (like DSP chips) available (as I believe engineer pointed to)? Is this why Irwin said they may need to switch wCDMA base stations to synchronous? If they did this, then this would mean wCDMA was closer to CDMA, no? I am just trying to empty my head of all the questions "... "synchronization". Can't do mobile without it." brings to mind