Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (135194)	5/16/2001 9:19:28 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Hi GV, re: 2X's more Nope - Generators suddenly charged 10Xs more, not 2Xs more. Meanwhile, California's usage did not even come close to increasing by 10Xs in one year. El Paso has the one pipe and complete dominance in that particular area of California. When Intel had 100% of the mobile market, should they have charged the consumer 10Xs more, even if demand was up by only 130%? Btw, Bush didn't like Andy Grove's idea for a high-tech tax cut for PC purchases (to stimulate hightech growth, 20% of GDP), yet Bush seems to like his tax cut for gas/oil. RE: "the likes of which we haven't seen since New York City's near bankruptcy in the mid 70's." What happened in NYC in mid-70's? What was that like? RE: "as long as the state continues to ignore the simplicity of its energy problem (too much demand for too little supply" The increase in demand is marginal, but the price increases aren't. The 13 new generators that are planned go well beyond the needs of the marginal demand increase. Regards, Amy J