SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (3068)5/16/2001 12:17:08 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
One radio show I listened to a couple years ago depicted Scaife as a very large donor to the Nixon White House. The Scaife family made billions of dollars on gov't contracts to make bombs during the Vietnamn War. Apparently Scaife was livid when Nixon went "down the tubes". I have always wondered if he hated the Clinton's so much because Hillary was one of the attorneys that worked on the Nixon removal for the Democrats. Just a theory........but not one that is hard to imagine.

Scaife is a national liability and I do believe he should be tried for treason. He essentially funded what history will describe as a non-violent coup de'tat ( sp?).

We now know that money can buy anything. This present administration is a sham front for corporate America.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (3068)5/16/2001 1:22:55 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Actually, I think there are members of the not so supreme court that are in the same category as Scaife. The court overturned the votes of over 50 million Americans as they enacted their own political agenda into the decision that installed shrub.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (3068)5/16/2001 1:23:20 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
And the American Bar Association should look into Olson's activities. I haven't heard
any news about his confirmation. Have I missed it?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (3068)5/17/2001 9:08:10 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 93284
 
I'd say that selling our nuclear secrets for campaign cash is a bigger deal. JLA