Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MRV Communications (MRVC) opinions? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sector Investor who wrote (31998)	5/16/2001 11:53:58 AM
From: signist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42804

Management's best effort to remove fleas with double-talk!??? ....Sheesh!

To: Sector Investor who wrote (31998)	5/16/2001 12:01:29 PM
From: Greg h2o	Respond to of 42804

gee, you guys are SO EASY! <G> while i think the wording is poor, i certainly don't think it was meant the way it actually came out... but, isn't that what attorneys are for?

To: Sector Investor who wrote (31998)	5/16/2001 12:09:35 PM
From: Duffeck	Respond to of 42804

<<You take that so literally. In programming an "OR" condition, it doesn't matter which condition is coded first>> In English I believe "OR" can also mean that the same as "AND" does mathematically and take the inclusive rather than the exclusive meaning and I think that is what was intended, namely number 1) In other words the conditions for distribution "could" include any "one" of the following. 1) MRV board of directors conclude that distribution is in the best interest of MRV AND MRV stockholders. 2) MRV board of directors conclude that distribution is in the best interest of MRV. 3) MRV board of directors conclude that distribution is in the best interest of stockholders. As I said I think number 1) was what was intended. Idle minds, duff