SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tinkershaw who wrote (42704)5/17/2001 12:20:38 AM
From: Eric K.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Re: Just to give an example, as part of that story (if memory serves, but I've seen this quoted by several "journalistic" sources - and it is so outrageous that its incredible that these quotes are not checked by this "journalists" (wonder if they've been to Al Gore's classes?) has been the assertion that Rambus will have to pay back royalties for royalties they've already been paid for SDRAM and DDR... Lets set it straight, worse case scenario, Rambus loses every bit of SDRAM and DDR IP, Rambus still gets to keep all the royalties they've been paid in regard. THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO REPAY BACK ANY ROYALTIES!!!!!

Here's a simple question to ask yourself, "Rambus was convicted of committing civil FRAUD against Infineon, who has paid $0 to RAMBus in royalties, and RAMBus was orderd to pay $3.5M (capped to $350K by Maryland statute) in PUNITIVE damages plus $0K in compensatory damages to Infineon as a result. Why can't Hitachi, Samsung, etc. file lawsuits claiming to have been DEFRAUDED by RAMBus, and (if they win) collect all royalties they paid as compensatory damages (plus interest, of course), plus punitive damages?"

The fact that several DRAMurai signed contracts with RAMBus to pay SDRAM royalties is irrelevant if it were found that the contracts were negotiated in bad faith because RAMBus' claims were fraudulent.

-Eric



To: tinkershaw who wrote (42704)5/17/2001 10:45:53 AM
From: Knight  Respond to of 54805
 
Premises for My RMBS Investment and Current FUD

Posted this on the RMBS board this morning:

Message 15813323

BTW: I don't follow the RMBS board very closely because of the "signal/noise ratio." This board seems to provide much better information in a much more concise form. Thanks folks, for the high-quality, civil discourse.