Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (146060)	5/17/2001 12:30:37 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Dear dear third, don't you think that questioning the Supreme Court decision the said selective counting with no standards is really really really stupid when in fact all subsequent counts based on standards that were the law at the time of the election and not the new cheat rules of Gore and Liberman blind brain washed vacant liberal minds such as you have shown that President Bush WoN BY EVEN A BIGGER MARGIN. you all have a nice day now hear. tom watson tosiwmee

To: ThirdEye who wrote (146060)	5/17/2001 8:50:10 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

Take the current Court, for example. In Bush v Gore, the idea of the majority was to render an opinion that applied ONLY for that case, something no judge in the entire history of the federal courts had ever done before. How creative! Oops! Nice try, but DEAD WRONG. JLA

To: ThirdEye who wrote (146060)	5/17/2001 9:30:54 AM
From: Mr. Palau	Respond to of 769670

>>In Bush v Gore, the idea of the majority was to render an opinion that applied ONLY for that case, something no judge in the entire history of the federal courts had ever done before.<< Yeah, but other courts are now catching on. A federal appeals court recently determined that a lawyer had violated one of its procedural rules, but decided against punishing her because she said the rule was unclear. The court let her off the hook, and then said that "This excuse is valid in this case only." The court cited Bush v. Gore for this point. The decision was written by one of the more conservative members of the court. caselaw.lp.findlaw.com