SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amy J who wrote (135342)5/17/2001 11:33:20 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 186894
 
Amy, I'm honored that you'd respond to a week old post like that. The most amusing treatment I've seen on the Itanic's revenue generation so far was in the Register back at the end of February. I hope Mike Magee can lure Andrew Orlowski over to his new rag, he's about the only guy I've seen there that can match Mike.

Checking our notes (March 28 last year to be precise), the talk
about Itanium was all main-memory databases, business
intelligence and decision support, and NUMA clusters. Yesterday, it
was almost a full hour by our clock before a panel member
volunteered any of these subjects. The tech compute guys were
happy with floating point performance, for sure. And the cost?
Mahlon Stacy of the Mayo Clinic said "We got it for free - so
price/performance was excellent." . . .
theregister.co.uk

That was a great article. The endless "We will bury you" huffing and puffing of the resident past and present Intel engineers is nowhere harder to take seriously than on the Itanic front.



To: Amy J who wrote (135342)5/17/2001 11:57:14 AM
From: Windsock  Respond to of 186894
 
Amy J - Re:"Win, who says they aren't paying for them?"

IBM and some other companies have a policy that requires the company to pay for prototypes provided by vendors. So at least some Itanium processors are generating revenue.

But the revenue is probably very low.