Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (73114)	5/17/2001 7:21:07 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Keith, In the post you are referencing, I only posted factual information in regards to what you repeatedly, albeit falsely claimed. Unfortunately, when you get on a roll, you tend to be repetitive, not to mention rather loose with the facts. IMO, you beat those lies, the insults & personal attacks to death in a public forum. My PM to you established clear evidence of that. "You send me a PM telling me to cease posting crap about you.......and look what we have here......you posting crap about me........interesting. So, somehow you feel like you have the right to post about me, but I am not permitted the same courtesy" The fact is that my PM asked you to quit violating SI's TOU. This isn't about posting crap. It's about sticking to the truth & adhering to SI's TOU, Keith. That is precisely what I asked you to do in that PM. I provided you clear evidence of those violations using your own words & provided links to the offending posts as well. Keith, your own words, taken in context, made it painfully clear what occurred. You made outrageous false claims about me, in absolute terms, that cannot be substantiated. You hurled insults & personal attacks, but your claims about me were substantially devoid of any factual information. My PM used your own words to establish a clear incontrovertible basis for my POV........ all of which is documented in a public forum. Your recollection of what was said in the PM is inaccurate Keith. Please feel free to read the PM again. I'm sure you will agree my POV is once again the right one. "Funny....I told you in a PM and publicly on another thread that I offered to quit posting to, or about you, if you would do the same........ But here you are....spewing more crap about me.....kg4 and his fudsters and etc......." I'm sorry Keith. I haven't had the opportunity to open your PM yet. I do know that the time stamp on your PM to me, <<May 17, 2001 9:28 AM>>, is in fact some 12 hours after the post that is giving you heartburn, <<Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:38 PM>>. Indeed, that post you are referencing was posted some 5 hours prior to my PM to you <<@ approx May 17, 2001 2:32 AM - I sent myself a copy right after I sent yours, in case we cannot resolve our dispute>> Apparently I was suppose to accept your proposal some 12 hours prior to you writing it? Did that occur to you at all? More importantly, you failed to keep your end of the bargain as well. You disparaged me in a post at 9:33 AM toady. This is the same post you mention your offer that you were simultaneously breaking. You replied to a post of mine on this thread @ 10:44 AM (It's the post I am replying to now). You replied to another post of mine @ 3:31 PM this afternoon. Then again at 3:37 PM, you replied to another post of mine. Message 15813051 Message 15815623 Message 15815581 Apparently you did not intend to honor your own word Keith To make matters worse, you did not even give me the opportunity to receive your offer, let alone respond to it before you broke your own offer more than once. Yet somehow you are finding fault with me. FWIW, I do not doubt you absolutely believe you are right in this whole dispute. Unfortunately the facts & reality are radically in conflict with your perception of reality. If you believe that I am wrong, please by all means point me to my posts where I clearly have bragged repeatedly about my resume all over SI to EVERY person I met. Same goes for all of your other false claims about me. Bottom line..... I provided you with your own verbatim quotes & links to every quote which established a clear pattern of blatant lies, etc. You cannot change those facts. The fact is that I didn't even discuss my resume on this thread in any detail at all..... ever..... nor do I have an established history on any other thread of doing anything remotely resembling what you have repeatedly claimed..... no if's, and's or but's about it........ What started this whole dispute was when I made one short statement about my background to give context to my POV......... however, since then, you have repeatedly made numerous false claims (regarding my resume, ET AL) in absolute terms that absolutely do not exist. Feel free to prove me wrong with any relevant facts Keith. I'm certain you won't be able to because you can't make blatant lies true just because you say so. "Your too much Tim!" Perhaps........ You're not enough Keith. That's where the problem lies. Ö¿Ö