Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geoffb_si who wrote (1006)	5/17/2001 3:22:02 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4051

Not much to say here. They've been talking about this geochem anomaly for over a year. For the nine month periods Nov 99 and Nov 20 89% and 82% respectively of its expenses were for management fees, admin, accounting, legal and shareholder communication. This is a high level especially when they spent almost zero on geology. I guess the promotion is about to get underway? Most of the showings in this area have been found because they outcrop. It is a prospective region. I wonder why they can't do some trenching if the anomalies are on the flank (exposed?) of the intrusion? It would be better to have some metal values in rock. Can't count it out due to the region. Can't buy it until there's a drill hole.