Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Prophet who wrote (73124)	5/17/2001 12:48:02 PM
From: SBHX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Prophet, Be careful, you might end up on his list. <g> SbH

To: The Prophet who wrote (73124)	5/18/2001 12:42:56 AM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

TP, This is a surprising disregard of the inherent "values" that might be attributed to the "subjective" as distinct from your preferred form of discourse. Particularly for one trained in the arts.<vbg> Not that you are alone in espousing this preference. I hear it often. So often that I am beginning to "suspect" that such "valuation" is rooted in some genetic predisposition to fear the subjective. But rather than continue this line, let me make sure I understand what you mean by presenting "negative information objectively?" Perhaps an example would be best. It occurs to me that what you may really be asserting is a preference for discourse without the use of personal attack; or you could be suggesting a more "balanced" method of presentation; or simply the use of less emotion in these exchanges; or it could be any number of things. Perhaps you did not intend to elevate the objective, over the subjective, as I see your statement inferring. 0\|0