SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tinkershaw who wrote (42743)5/17/2001 4:38:41 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54805
 
"I would like to know, who, at JEDEC claims to have invented the Rambus inventions" - Jim Rockwell

No one claims this. This is a wrong question.

All main elements of Rambus invention were invented
and made public well before Rambus, see example:

Scalable Coherent Interface, published in 1988:
slac.stanford.edu

It contains all relevant ideas about Dual Data Rate,
packet protocols, and current-steering drivers.
Control registers were invented much earlier.

Rambus combined the known techniques into a multiplexed
interconnection, with special configuration means,
called "Concurrent Rambus", or Ram-BUS-1.
No one denies this. It is important to discern
that the contemporary Rambus in Pentium-4 machines
is not the patented Rambus-1, it is very different
in its bus architecture and configuration/setup.

However, it is not quite clear who actually
invented the contemporary Rambus, or "Direct Rambus".
True, it was originally promoted by Rambus, but
with several important omissions. Currently
Intel holds a patent that seems to be closest
to current Rambus implementation:

delphion.com
US6173345:Method and apparatus for levelizing transfer delays for a channel of devices such as memory devices in a memory subsystem

Hope it clears some confusions between patents and reality.



To: tinkershaw who wrote (42743)5/18/2001 3:34:50 AM
From: Dinesh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Hi Tinker,

Mr Rockwell certainly doesn't mince his words. But I do find
his line of reasoning a bit, how do you say it, awkward ?

This is akin to telling the cop (who's caught you speeding)
that everyone else is speeding too and therefore
he (she?) should let you off. I wonder how well this plan
works. Actually I do have some recollections of such
pleadings from my early childhood :-(

I am sure there is no dearth of examples. Any LSAT book
will do.

Oh, I am very neutral on RMBS. I haven't got the foggiest
what RDRAM does and why is it any better. If I needed the
speed I'd probably first upgrade my 166 Pentium MMX...

Regards
-Dinesh