Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flatsville who wrote (103003)	5/17/2001 5:21:32 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<Really DAK, just respond, "Hee-haw, hee-haw...(repeat)" to my posts. It so much closer to the level of intellectual and emotional maturity you often display and takes so much less bandwith.> You are correct that I don't exert much intellectual energy to you posts... after all you've gone in circles twice in the past few days just that I've seen with various posters with YOUR lack of intellect, and I don't even read all of it! Besides, it's so easy just to toss your own stuff back at you as a refute to your position. It's peculiar that you mention emotional maturity, if you even know what it is, as it's so painfully obvious you have little. You post every story that comes along that even resembles something which aligns itself with your scripting in life and toss it on the screen as some masterful proof of your philosophy with little or no feeling or attempt to understand anothers experience or viewpoint... as if so much is invested in your own beliefs that any recognition or feeling for another's would be devastating. If there were another so rigid in belief you could start a thread called 'dialogue of the deaf'. Instead we have monologue of the deaf... and THAT is what is known as an immature communication pattern FYI. Sorry to be so harsh, but you brought it up. My belief remains clear... 1.) That it is clear that 'greedy traders' are not the root cause of the California debacle. 2.) That the California situation does NOT preclude deregulation working ie. that California was NOT deregulated anyway and can't be shown as proof that it won't work. 3.) That there has been underinvestment in the sector for some time... during which it WAS regulated. DAK