To: FR1 who wrote (40759 ) 5/27/2001 4:05:17 PM From: puborectalis Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369 from Barrons... Doug Kass is a hedge-fund manager and a fellow we've known for a slug of years now. What separates him from the pack is that he's compiled an absolutely terrific record these past two and a half years, while so many in the pack have barely kept their heads above water and certainly not above high water. Specifically, on a gross basis -- before the healthy (except for their limited partners) cut of profits that hedge-fund mangers take -- Doug was up 87% in '99, 88% last year, and this year, is ahead by 21%. He works far from the madding crowd in Palm Beach, hard by the blue Atlantic; hence, the name of his fund, Seabreeze Partners. As we've indicated before in this hallowed space, Doug loves to short stocks. Which also helps explains his exemplary performance. A couple of months ago, Doug laid his bearskin aside and began leavening his portfolio with some longs. What he can't lay aside completely, however, is his inveterate skepticism. And last we spoke with him, he described his view of the market as agnostic. (Our favorite definition of an agnostic is someone who says, "I'm an atheist, thank God." But never mind). In any case, Doug has by no means foresworn going short. And his favorite short right now is AOL Time Warner. It's a stock that, to his profit, he had been negative on, covered at $36 to $38 when he thought the market was ready for a big bounce, and recently shorted again. It closed around 53.50 on Friday. Essentially, Doug is convinced that AOL's growth potential is limited by a maturing personal-computer industry and the company's high penetration of the market for its services. By way of support for the latter observation, he notes that this year stacks up as the second in row in which AOL is slated to snare a smaller number of net new additions to its subscription base. Doug also is leery of management's confidence that it is not notably vulnerable to the sick economy. Not only is the Time contingent obviously feeling the impact of droopy ad outlays, but the AOL part of the company, he feels, is hardly immune, either. He sees the recent announcement of a boost in AOL's subscription fees as a response to the softer operating environment. Whether it discourages existing subscribers, or makes it more difficult to attract new ones, remains to be seen. For this year and next, he thinks Street estimates are too high. He expects something like $1.25 for this year and $1.45 for next. That means the stock is selling at 44 times '01 earnings and 38 times next year's. Which makes it pretty darn rich. Also noteworthy is that management has been selling stock hand over fist. There are many reasons, to be sure, for insider sales. But a strong belief that the shares are headed higher is rarely among them