SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1012)5/17/2001 5:38:29 PM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4051
 
I don't think 10% zinc is there, probably closer to the 4% number, with some other values added. It seems pretty large however. Isn't the MMI pretty high confidence geochem especially given the off the chart readings and the dry desert conditions? Also it's not exactly like the market cap has run away on us with 11 million shares out, plus 6.6 million warrants (for 25 cents cash, didn't really care for that much, but only to 2-02).



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (1012)5/18/2001 12:22:18 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4051
 
<. I'm wondering why they think they have such a hot target with only a geochem anomaly? >

Well what they say is that the geochem values are extraordinarily high when compare to the background. And indeed they are.

I've asked one of the director about other possible sources (of contamination) for the high values... and they have no explanation. Can you think of some other possibilities ?

Claude


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News