Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Estephen who wrote (73211)	5/18/2001 9:10:51 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

SDRAM for the Pentium 4 arriving earlier than expected - June or July. Thursday, May 17, 2001 Intel 845 with PC133 SDRAM Support in June! [4:15 pm] Rat According to our sources in Taiwan, the first version of Intel 845 chipset (Intel 845A) for Pentium 4 processors supporting PC133 SDRAM will really be released in June (if worst comes to worst, it will happen in July), as we have actually predicted. The chipset is likely to be announced at Computex show already, in early June. At least as far as we know, many mainboard manufacturers are planning to showcase their solutions on this chipset at Computex. xbitlabs.com

To: Estephen who wrote (73211)	5/18/2001 10:16:16 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Basher?? Me?? Ha......I suggest you get a dictionary....I have never "bashed" this stock or any other.....nor have aI ever "pumped" or hyped any stock.....discuss the positive's and negatives.....sure.....get in the occasional disagreement with an individual....sure....but I do not bash, or hype any stock....sorry fella......find somebody else to blame....... I was a rmbs believer until they had their heads handed to them on a platter in this latest fiasco. If discussing a stocks fall from triple digits to single digits, lost court rulings, fraud rulings, what lies ahead for the future of this company...if discussing that is bashing........then I would imagine the list of bashers on the internet would be very large and would include anybody that made a negative comment about a stock......and I would also imagine pumpers would be anybody with something positive to say. I really think you have your definitions mixed up...I can't speak for anyone on your list but myself, but I certainly am not a basher or a pumper...never have been...never will....in fact, bashing and pumping a stcok make me sick.....true discussion, positive or negative, does not. Big differance my friend.

To: Estephen who wrote (73211)	5/18/2001 1:25:25 PM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Madame Defarge-- Could you share with the thread an executive summary of what the point of your list of bashers is? -Eric

To: Estephen who wrote (73211)	5/18/2001 2:48:48 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 93625

est, if you had followed the "bashers'" advice then your portfolio would be in much better shape. do you fully understand this contradiction? you'd rather lose money than listen to bashers (who are bashing the company for legitimate purposes). when a company acts like a punk, they ought to be bashed so folks know the truth. go ahead and lose more money if fiscal s&m is your gig. who am i to argue? can i get bumped up on your list? i heard the top 3 get a monthly check. har har har! ;-)