SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (3118)5/18/2001 12:37:15 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
I recall many years ago a DoD spec for a blueberry muffin. It was one of those specs that were cited as a silly regulation. It was a short one, two pages. You might be surprised that someone could manage to put together two pages of specs on a blueberry muffin. It covered all sorts of stuff, size and weight, percentage of blueberries, acceptable levels of rat feces and insect parts, the whole deal.

I read a follow on story where they tracked down the dude that wrote the spec. His response. Prior to the spec, when the Army ordered blueberry muffins they got muffins smaller than you would have ever imagined; what you thought was blueberries was large amounts of rat feces. It turned out that the Army had no recourse with the vendor, because there was no spec and the vendor called it a blueberry muffin.

Once again, I would agree with you. There should be some regulation and there should be a case for it.

jttmab



To: Neocon who wrote (3118)5/18/2001 3:34:28 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
The question is one of "how high the bar"? Regulators should have to make a case...
It could be argued, and well, that people have to prove themselves responsible to get extraordinary privledges. You must pass a driving test to get a driver's license. There is no reason that a businessman should not pass an ethics test to run a business.
TP