Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (135528)	5/19/2001 4:17:49 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 186894

Paul, Re:You want Intel to jump to the tune of two AMD-paid bashers who sponsor the AMD-Platfrom Farce? When they happen to be correct? Yep. Doug

To: Paul Engel who wrote (135528)	5/19/2001 4:33:40 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, Remember how everyone screamed around here when McComas did his overclocked BX piece, which showed that PC133 was faster than PC1600 on PIII? Turned out he was 100% correct. Scumbria

To: Paul Engel who wrote (135528)	5/20/2001 12:16:59 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: You want Intel to jump to the tune of two AMD-paid bashers You tell 'em Paul. It's as big a pile of hooey as that absurd story Tom's Hardware was spewing about there being a problem with the PIII 1.13 chip. Or reports of problems with the 3 RIMM 820 boards. Or reports of problems with the profustion chipset. Or reports of problems with the MTH. All just FUD from the AMD-paid bashers. It's for sure that these guys are just as wrong as Tom Pabst was... One thing you really have to give Intel credit for, and that's consistency. Dan