Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (35471)	5/28/2001 3:25:43 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Message 15859416 ""Frankly, I am shocked to see a post from you.....I thought we agreed to leave each other alone. "" Please get your facts straight Keith. I never agreed to your proposals to, 'not post to each other'. The truth is that I repeatedly asked you to stop harassing me & violating SI's TOU. I encouraged you to freely discuss any issue you want to debate with me at any time, just do not violate SI's TOI with your vulgar insults, malicious invective & blatant lies. However, I never accepted your offer. That's a fact Keith. Here's proof........ ____________________________________________________________ Message 15816837 <<Keith said>> """You send me a PM telling me to cease posting crap about you.......and look what we have here......you posting crap about me........interesting. So, somehow you feel like you have the right to post about me, but I am not permitted the same courtesy" <<my reply>> The fact is that my PM asked you to quit violating SI's TOU. This isn't about posting crap. It's about sticking to the truth & adhering to SI's TOU, Keith. That is precisely what I asked you to do in that PM.""......... ......Your recollection of what was said in the PM is inaccurate Keith. Please feel free to read the PM again. I'm sure you will agree my POV is once again the right one. <<Keith said>> "Funny....I told you in a PM and publicly on another thread that I offered to quit posting to, or about you, if you would do the same........ But here you are....spewing more crap about me.....kg4 and his fudsters and etc......." <<my reply>> I'm sorry Keith. I haven't had the opportunity to open your PM yet. I do know that the time stamp on your PM to me, <<May 17, 2001 9:28 AM>>, is in fact some 12 hours after the post that is giving you heartburn, <<Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:38 PM>>........... Apparently I was suppose to accept your proposal some 12 hours prior to you writing it? Did that occur to you at all? More importantly, you failed to keep your end of the bargain as well. You disparaged me in a post at 9:33 AM toady. This is the same post you mention your offer that you were simultaneously breaking. You replied to a post of mine on this thread @ 10:44 AM (It's the post I am replying to now). You replied to another post of mine @ 3:31 PM this afternoon. Then again at 3:37 PM, you replied to another post of mine......... ........Apparently you did not intend to honor your own word Keith To make matters worse, you did not even give me the opportunity to receive your offer, let alone respond to it before you broke your own offer more than once. Yet somehow you are finding fault with me. ____________________________________________________________ Message 15821947 <<Keith said>> """I think I will now just put him on ignore....he can talk all he wants about me if he wishes......I do not care, and wont even bother to read him anymore........" <<my reply>> That is fine with me. All I ask is that you immediately cease the blatant lies, vulgar insults & personal attacks."" ____________________________________________________________ If you still believe I agreed to your proposals not post to each other Keith, please provide a link to the post. FWIW, I am certain no such agreement exists.......... except in your perception of reality............ Your recollection of our agreement to not post to each other simply never happened in the real world Keith. Amazingly, you can make up lies about our non-existent agreement, but you repeatedly violated the terms of it after making the offer to me. What also amazes me is that you can be so ridiculously harsh on others with your flawed perception of their misdeeds, but you seem to be totally blind to your own. Keith, it is your inability to actually grasp factual information & your penchant for attacking folks based on your faulty perception of reality is why we end up at odds. You attacked Jim with almost no understanding of the facts & history behind his post. You lacked any factual basis for your baseless verbal assault on Jim too. Your recollection of his history was severely flawed as usual. You invented facts that simply do not exist & used that as your basis to attack Jim. That is what prompted my reply Keith. When you attack me or my peers with your malicious invective & baseless lies, don't be surprised to find a reply from me, if only to set the facts straight. It's about reality Keith. The REAL one. Ö¿Ö