SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (146795)5/21/2001 12:52:08 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
Dear dear patricia, is it just your stupidity or are you again lying. You say >>>>>It appears true that the new Bush administration had been LYING about the outgoing Clinton administration!! Aren't you shocked at the news? LOL

Patricia I'm not shocked to find you have your facts all wrong again. Does a hateful frustrated sick soul cause someone to misread words in this way. Or is this just more of patricia and the standard sick democrat way of faking information to mislead and cause devision.

The title of the article. Clinton's aides didn't vandalize the White House.

Patricia, if you can read, read the article you just pointed to.
washingtonpost.com

It's official: President Clinton's aides didn't vandalize the White House, scrawl lewd notes or steal presidential trinkets as they departed and the Bush administration moved in, as some critics had charged.

The Post and other outlets soon raised doubts about the claims, and also reported on Bush's statement that the allegations were false.

You see President Bush made certain that the truth came out quickly as President Bush respects the office of the President. This is a major difference from the former scum your favorite first rapist.

Based on the words in the article I understand why you made your lying allegation and put only the reference and did not quote from the article.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (146795)5/23/2001 11:41:48 PM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Patricia, thank you but nothing surprises me, when an expensive no cost is too great campaign to smear the Clinton administration was witnessed in total by me. I have asked colleagues now why we don't have all the mud slinging, they responded that the current admin is pure, I responded that current admins party's is the king of dirty politics