Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: t2 who wrote (77274)	5/21/2001 5:43:02 PM
From: JOHN W.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Bears are quiet today<gggg>.. I warned you guys-shorts now twice..and was mocked... Message 15728564 This is the third and last warning. Cover your shorts now

To: t2 who wrote (77274)	5/21/2001 7:54:39 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Nothing wrong being a enthusiastic Naz fan...but New Vision: Sorry but you are a reckless poster. Not necessarily towards the SI Community but to thousands of outsiders on the look out for some kind of reassurance about present questionable rally which to me would make only sense if one would consider the lorry loads of cheap paper the makers and shakers have picked up recently in their -/+ 1.5 trillion evaporation act. After all they want to get rid of this excess inventory with an additional profit attached. Even if you don't agree with my view you fail to recognize the fact that the mortally wounded most of the times find enough strength to portray a recovery in progress-only to close their eyes afterwards for good. Apparently you don't watch the tape involving some of the high tech stocks you are so found off. Because if you would you could notice that it takes no more as the release of human air with a bang and the bids sink in 1/2 point fractions. And that means to me trigger happy dancing bears are out in force to raid the camps again as soon bad earning news is released. Most of all I call you reckless because in my collection of questionable hypmen your name could not hide from my hungry mouse, finding some real beauties which could show that "reckless" needs no <G>. Like this for example, you do remember don't you? >>>MSFT can't cause a crash in the Nasdaq. The last time the stock dropped on the fact finding, it had no effect on the rest of the market. I think the rest of the techs will still rally considering that there has been a correction last week.>>> Message 13332360 The very next day US and overseas investors lost billions and had to read the following headline. Hit by Microsoft, tech gauge tumbles nearly 350 points. cnnfn.cnn.com Regards, ED