Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirRealist who wrote (47780)	5/21/2001 6:00:09 PM
From: Blue Voodoo	Respond to of 49816

The stats from that yahoo post I copied were wrong. Here's the correction, still looks good for omkt: Most recent quarter: earnings per share: IWOV -.25, OMKT -.19 revenues per share: IWOV .58, OMKT .27 today price per share: IWOV 22.2, OMKT 1.40 So, on a per share basis: Open market has half the revenues of interwoven, Open Market lost less money than interwoven, yet open market sells for ONE FIFTEENTH the price of Interwoven. When you buy IWOV, you are paying 38 dollars for every one dollar of revenue last quarter. When you buy OMKT you are paying 5 dollars for every dollar of revenue last quarter. IWOV's revenues are over 7 times as expensive as open market's revenues. Are IWOV's revenues really be worth over 7 TIMES as much as OMKT's revenues? Even though IWOV is LOSING more money per share than OMKT is?