SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (13944)5/21/2001 4:43:11 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I'd guess you'd know about that one, wouldn't you, idiot-Bill. But then, as ever, you are the hypocrite's hypocrite. Not exactly a surprise that you don't know Jack, either.



To: Bill who wrote (13944)5/21/2001 5:14:07 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Guess I should turn him in to the SI Sheriff?? JLA



To: Bill who wrote (13944)5/21/2001 5:49:16 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
But he's free to disclose his own.

Only he's so ashamed of his posts that he not only won't publicly admit who he is, but he actually used to post under his real name and changed it because he was so embarrassed by some of the garbage he had posted.

It's one thing to sign up with an alias from the beginning. It's entirely another to start with your own name and realize how badly you're shaming yourself and decide then to hide behind an alias.



To: Bill who wrote (13944)5/22/2001 2:59:36 AM
From: Chris land  Respond to of 82486
 
<<<Did you know it is a TOU violation to disclose the real name of SI posters?>>>

Personally I think people who hide behind aliases ought to be exposed for who they really are. That way people will be much more careful in what they post.

Adam and Eve hid behind the fig leaves, SI posters hide behind aliases.....nothing new under the sun!

Chris