Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (147183)	5/22/2001 1:02:51 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So Linda Tripp's breaking of the law should excuse Clinton's breaking of the law? You're justifying your position right into a corner. ~SB~

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (147183)	5/22/2001 1:11:33 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Clinton's duty is to the court. Once the lawsuit is accepted, whatever its outcome, he is supposed to abide by the rules of evidence and the court's rulings. I do not think that Paula was "paid off", but it is irrelevant. As for the illegal taping, what is ruled admissable is admissable. I do not blame Linda for wanting protection against reprisals. In the end, the hope is to discredit the investigation, rather than to take a hard look at Clinton. Why get involved with Monica with the lawsuit already running? Why get involved with Monica when he had reason to think she was immature and untrustworthy? Why get involved with Monica in front of the whole office staff, practically? He couldn't contain himself for awhile, or find a more discreet way of satisfying himself? Face it, Clinton did it to himself.......