SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (14050)5/22/2001 3:58:55 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 82486
 
So I won't apportion blame in any specific way.


The boss is supposed to accept all the blame and parcel out all the credit. There's no need to equivocate.

Karen



To: epicure who wrote (14050)5/23/2001 12:20:10 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Well then, no blame, no shame, no problem.



To: epicure who wrote (14050)5/23/2001 1:28:19 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"...could have stopped them, then he she or it is partly- or even mostly, or maybe completely responsible."

If we are still talking about the All Powerful One, then the answer is, yes "could've." However, this is not God's role in worldly affairs as I understand it. As far as "responsible." I reserve that term for human choices (and I understand some of you tend to personify God..not me).


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News