Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (147472)	5/22/2001 4:54:30 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Guess I should take it all back. I didn't know the Republicans had any self-appointed thought police watching the board. Sounds more like a Demo tactic. On second thought, I'll repeat: GET LOST.....

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (147472)	5/22/2001 5:03:40 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Dear agustus, if the only true critiism you can come up with it spelling well I no we will all miss your incesantful words. BUt thanks for impugn I noticed that mpune came up misselled but when I put it on the electronic dictionary I got this. Found 1 entry for impune impune \Im*pune"\, a. [L. impunis.] Unpunished. [R.] Anyway anyone who posts should not expect to go impune. I accept your assertion that other than correcting spulling and gamma you can't argue with me here. As I've pointed out to you, I don't believe pointing out the those who say they all lie think that way because they are liar's most likely themselves does a disservice to anyone who respects the truth and respect those who are careful with their words and tell the truth. Good luck you all have a nice day now hear. tom watson tosiwmee

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (147472)	5/22/2001 5:07:29 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

You don't seem to realize that we are at war with the American left for the survival of our nation. It doesn't make any difference whether or not your are offended by anyone's prose. What matters is that we win and they lose. It is the milquetoast "get along/go along" attitude that allowed Clinton to avoid conviction for his crimes and then to start a genocidal war that disgraced the US, which he hates. It then led to the Democrat Party trying to rig a presidential election with manufactured votes and only then losing by pure random chance (or possibly God is an American.) You fail to understand the world you now live in because of those Republican failures, and thus you contribute to setting the stage for possible future errors. Be advised, however, that you are either part of the solution or part of the problem. I wish you the best of luck in the new environment you helped create...

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (147472)	5/22/2001 5:14:28 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Agustus, I stated to you that I did not want to discuss things privately to which you the responded with this. Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:52 PM ET To: Thomas A Watson (who wrote) From: Agustus Gloop There is no need to reply! Just understand that I feel that Newt Gingrich was a true visionary and as a result was targeted by the democrats because of the potential he had. "So I see you as clueless" Rule number one - Never underestimate who you are dealing with. "I use language precisely" I'd say not quite as well as you think! See my response! ........................................................ If you don't see how your response to scum implying an admission that you believed that Newt Gingrich was just another they all lie politician I say that you are clueless to understanding what a true visionary is just as you are clueless to the importence of truth. You also have not read my posts that test cluelessness by using mispelling to identity those who having no ability to argue on issue but only spelling. It's a very quick way to size up who you are dealing with. And for the record this was my last private post to you. Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:44 PM ET To: Agustus Gloop (who wrote) From: Thomas A Watson gloop, I don't want to discuss in private. but I will point out this. You use the term politicians on both sides and ascribe some logic to the claim. I see that as you dumbly do not see we are speaking of Newt Gingrich and the guy I call mr bill. So I see you as clueless in understanding that language must be used carefully or the dumb will say dumb things. Now we may agree on what are correct solutions in the political sense. But in an open forum the lazy mind has to use generalizations. I use specifics and I speak in specifics. I use language precisely and anyone who is sloppy and expresses something that has a questionable meaning I speak to clearly and directly in terms that I call brutal truth. That's my style. Those who have posted on this thread for a while understand my style and many love it. A few are infuriated by it. I personally ignore posts from scum as he posts one line lies and stupidity over and over and over. If you find my posts offensive, you can ignore me. I'm not going to respond to any more private messages. tom w. ....................................................... Oh well I guess I should have added another privately to my last sentence to be precise. tom watson tosiwmee