SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (147585)5/22/2001 9:51:09 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
Dear J_F, both sides of the story have been told. mr bill who has lied about his screwing around and lied about lying about screwing around and has admitted to lying under oath says it was consentual and Ms Browerick says it was rape. I heard here story first hand. To me her story is true beyond any reasonable doubt. I suspect rapist would tend to believe lying mr. bill. The stupid and child molesters would also all tend to believe mr. bill.

I wonder why mr bill does not have a counter published interview.

So if you want to see the truth and still believer mr bill well that's your left.
freeweb.pdq.net the text.

And streaming video. It is difficult for pig vomit and the pig vomit who defend a rapist to hide from the truth of first person testimony.

iclips.com

you all have a nice day now hear.
tom watson tosiwmee



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (147585)5/22/2001 10:13:39 PM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
What do you believe? OJ innocent?



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (147585)5/23/2001 8:51:59 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Does the act itself count for nothing? Is the only thing that matters what people believe? If a rape happened and the rapist goes free, does that mean the rape didn't happen?