Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Saving the Alaska Wildlife Refuge (ANWR: People’s version) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (25)	5/27/2001 2:51:12 PM
From: Marty Rubin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36

John, One of the ways to implicitly say "I'm wrong" is by moving away from the topic. We are not talking about population growth, but about the encouragement of oil production (with minimal impact) when other alternatives are available. I already gave possible solutions to population growth earlier. It's a great problem for environmentalist, and I don't know what the different groups are doing to tackle this issue. But this problem is more related to deforestation and/or therefore water pollution. Forests (greenery) limits the damage oil creates, but an argument can be made on many fronts, as practically all items on earth are interconnected . Have a nice weekend, Marty For you my dear: Cheapest gas station in U.S. & Canada: gasbuddy.com (source: KTLA Ch. 5/Kurt @ cyberguy.com I can only imagine how expensive it may be to drive an SUV these days ("Fuel Economy for Selected Cars," Business Week, June 4, pg 101).