Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ZenWarrior who wrote (148498)	5/24/2001 9:10:20 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

dear zen, it seem to me that you are in duck dodge and weave. If you reread my post (with just a little care) it never claimed you said. But Cheney's call to construction exaggerates, if not misconstrues, the nation's future energy problems. Read this sentence. Zen has posted a retarded analysis that in now way shows in any fashion that this statement has any merit. Did you forget that you posted the article that contained this post and when I showed it to you to explain why may was used you came back with more defense of the article. Am I the only person in this dialog who can connect concepts across posts. Now I said the guy who wrote that was dumber than dirt because he nowhere in the article even tried to identify what demand would become and what capacity is now and what capacity is needed to meet the expected growth. Zen this is not rocket science. This is simple arithmetic. But I guess your ability to understand the concept of simple arithmetic is like you ability to connect the conversation across the several posts that we have exchanged. You have consistently said I should not attack this stupid article and accused me of being a biased whatever. I don't have clue as to why you say that. I consider that when one says an attack is wrong and will not provide any arguments on the facts of the article, I assume he is defending the article and taking what is said on hook, line, and sinker faith. So I have stated what is wrong with the article and how it fails the basics of showing the assertion that it leads with. But Cheney's call to construction exaggerates, if not misconstrues, the nation's future energy problems. Don't you see at all that Witless does not make his case. for those just jumping in on this dialog of zen. usnews.com this is the original article posted by zen that I call stupid and zen says I guess it's the gospel based on zen's zen and no facts. Also zen, I not attempting to discredit anyone who in anyway helps discredit the Bush-Cheney Energy proposal. I have discredited the retard who wrote the article you posted as I have explained to you several times. Now as to Cheney's call for 1 new power plant built per week is already being done. Is that really true. Are they being built where the capacity is needed? Oh I guess there are no rolling blackouts and there is no energy shortage. duhhhhhh If you take the time to look into the whitehouse.gov and get the big picture... Well zen, my guess is energy policy is way to complex an object for mosts computer programers, It's and ee system's engineer kind of problem. Actually it's a fairly simple common sense problem, and orders of magnitude to complex for vacant liberal minds. tom watson tosiwmee