SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric L who wrote (11930)5/26/2001 12:39:05 PM
From: foundation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
"...In reality, GPRS must succeed. If the industry does not get GPRS right then 3G could be seriously, perhaps fatally, wounded..."
----------

In reality, in the world of science, there is no reason that GPRS must succeed.

If the industry does not get GPRS right, then 3G in Europe could be seriously.... wounded.

But only in Europe.

The remainder of the continents can, and will, do quite well without it.



To: Eric L who wrote (11930)5/26/2001 12:55:28 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
ref Ian Channing, don't overextend yourself, Eric..

-GPRS is an incrementally _improved_ bearer
technology, data packets for the backbone, "switches"
(becoming routers),base stations, air interface and
handsets.
As well as billing, roaming and handover systems and the
whole business idea.

Nothing "simply" in that, except if one just looks at the
air interface without really understanding even that.

- who has bought a non-GPRS-updatable GSM system lately??
(or rather, who would produce something like that)

- handset vendors, media blame, yes, blaming is always
more fun and less demanding than informing.

- This "overhyped" seem to be mostly of a strawman tactic,
first construct ones own little "reality" and then have
fun with it. Some say it has deep sexual reasons, some
"dogging" ones, but shows a capability of creativity.

- what kind of "actual gains" was/is GPRS supposed to
achieve over "traditional circuit-switched data
transmission"

Would be polite to list the factors of that strawman
and then analyze them, one by one, and all together.
(without kind of sneaking in EDGE, and also mentioning
HSCD, which he barely does, both)

- traditional operators used to digging ditches,
keeping switches up and running, etc..

Good point, but most operators have practiced billing
for 900(? the sexual service ones) calls as well as
internet. However, some have saved the investments
of even billing by flat rating local calls, others have
actually succeeded in setting up local internet routers
to be able to sell DSL service, some even rent their
copper wires,etc,etc..

As a good, constructive vendor, Nokia even offers their
Nokia Club,business model analyzer, and the thought that
operators maybe should not start investing in their own 900
services.

Ilmarinen

OK,OK, he could be much, much worse...