Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (14653)	5/27/2001 8:00:31 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I'm not sure what we disagree on. Is it that you don't agree that it causes suffering to deprive impoverished third world women who already have eight or ten half-starved children at home of birth control if the doctor at a particular clinic answers a sick, AIDS-infected, pregnant woman's question about the abortion option? (Not provides an abortion, answers her question. We're talking about the Gag Order.) Or is it that you acknowledge that this policy creates suffering (more starving, orphaned, children and AIDS-babies, more despairing, uneducated, malnourished adults) but feel it is well worth it because if 41 shots were fired, then those cops deserve what they.... Oh, sorry, wrong ivory tower. I mean well worth it because of your values? So what was it we disagree on?