Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (14677)	5/28/2001 3:13:50 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Gibberish, again you're talking gibberish. "You know, Greg--I never really meant: Replace "God". I meant, replace: Racism, Warfare, Chosen Peoples, Superstition, Genocide, subjugation of others, and Human Sacrifice. You can keep God..." Clearly you seem to have a problem with these things, Why? Are they wrong? Do they violate your rules? If not, why do you harp on them as if they are. I wonder which side of your mouth you will answer out of today. Have a morally neutral evening. Greg

To: Solon who wrote (14677)	5/28/2001 3:36:38 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You should make up your mind, do you want anarchy, or reason? It seems you equate the two? Why should people be expected to behave in a particular manner that corresponds to your unspoken assumptions about what is correct? I don't get the impression that you believe a word you say. If there are "no rules..period" then what can be drawn upon to distinguish between what is decent and indecent, what is reasonable or unreasonable, and what is considerate or inconsiderate? Why all the expectations? You are in essence saying that no rules are needed as long as nobody does anything wrong. Assuming a standard, and denying it's existence at the same time. Now that's twisted logic. You can't have both.