Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (14731)	5/28/2001 5:22:58 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

What about those who chose to be irrational and immature? They were not considered as part of the island group hypothesis. If you wish to associate with such, hunt down a religious cult. How do you know someone is a "good hearted person" unless you have something to compare them to (like an evil hearted person)? It appears to me that you are now simply being obstructionist. I don't mind pulling teeth once; but it is rude of you to insist that we keep pulling yours out over and over again from the same sockets. The world is full of examples of indecent, uncaring, inconsiderate people. You are trying to pretend that you cannot make such assessments, while at the same time you wish your postings to be considered as the product of a thinking process! LOL! <<"if we don't have government, we are not allowed to think. I forgot about that. Good point!"<< Non sequitur, are you drinking again? It followed from your insinuation that you could not have both reason and anarchy, so your assertion is incorrect. As to the question of if I am drinking (again): Yes, Red Rose tea. What are you having for supper? As to the last part of your post, I already told you that I have never denied the existence of reason. In fact I have championed the ideal. Please accept this, or show me a post where I denied its existence. Hello! "Hello in there, hello."