Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (149289)	5/28/2001 9:56:28 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That idea was actually discussed in at length in 1945, and rejected for reasons that were perfectly reasonable for the historical environment at the time. We still all think of World War II as a John Wayne movie where the enemy was doomed from the start and it was just a matter of waiting for the inevitable fall of Berlin and Tokyo. It was nothing of the kind. The idea that Imperial Japan would have surrendered after a massive fireworks display and radio waves full of propaganda was, then as now, absurd. The conventional air strikes against Japanese cities had been destroying 2-3 cities a week without a word from the enemy. The idea that they could sacrifice their cities for the "victory" of shooting down a few B-29's in the process appeared to us to be perfectly acceptable to them. There was no way to dispute that concept. The counter-argument that it might not be what they really believed was totally academic, and irrelevant. The PROOF that a city could be destroyed with one plane, at high altitude, using one bomb, and escaping with full fighter cover, swayed their decision. Perhaps no one who did not live through WWII, whether here or abroad, can ever fully understand the idea that it had to be ended in victory as quickly as possible. Can you possibly take that on faith? (It isn't so difficult.)

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (149289)	5/28/2001 10:19:23 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I'm sure that the Chinese at the time weren't too concerned with human rights issues connected to the bombs being dropped on Japan. Or the British who suffered through the Blitzkreig. War is hell, and those that brought it have no rights to grievances. ~SB~