Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quartersawyer who wrote (11024)	5/28/2001 10:16:59 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196721

chapq, << that this was a "risk chip" >> I wasn't really sure that there were any MSM5105 "risk" chips out there ... or even if there were any MSM5105's at all, although this is just about (perhaps a tad early) for initial production arrival. My assumption has been that virtually everything out there is MSM5100, unless Samsung has a chip. << oddly written rehash from Chosun >> Ya got that right. Lakers called it correctly. Every article out of Korea raises more questions than it answers. << Are you hearing something new >> Yes. We have never heard specifically of claimed defects in Q chips, or specific mention of MSM-5105, or convolution cover code (whatever that is). Also the reference to MSN-5100 (MSM-5100) roll out dates (October) which seems somewhat realistic off of a mid April sampling, but first I've heard a date on other than Hoffman's report the other day, which I found confusing. One report ... out of Korea ... we just have to keep our fingers crossed and hope for the best. - Eric -