Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (35481)	5/30/2001 3:42:17 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Excuse me? How many times did you post to or about me since you made your second request? How many blatant lies did you tell in those posts? And you want me to stop posting to you? Are you for real? Message 15863887 As you see I have serious reservations with you absurd request. I also provided you with a solution resolve our problem. Your second request is now even more absurd. You want me to stop posting to you or about you, yet you continue to post about me on various threads on SI........... Message 15864134 Message 15864234 Message 15864246 Message 15864483 Message 15864146 ____________________________________________________________ Let's see those links you found Keith. Message 15864634 ____________________________________________________________ This following post is chock full of lies. Message 15864194 Can you prove any of your allegations in that post about me Keith? I am certain that you can't because I know what you said about me is false. Do you just make your stuff up & insist it is true? Do you really believe that just because you said it, it is true? You violate SI's TOU with your vulgar insults & personal attacks. You persist in posting lies about my peers & myself & repeat them frequently. You speak in absolute terms as though you are stating facts when you repeat these lies. We are not exchanging insults tit for tat. You are alone in that battle. All I'm doing is proving again & again you are repeatedly lying about my peers & myself with malicious, baseless allegations & personal attacks. I do not stoop to your level. I debate the issues. I state my opinions forcefully. When I speak in absolutes, I can & often do provide undeniable facts replete with links to support my POV. Why can't you see the difference between us Keith? The truth hurts Keith. Get used to it. ____________________________________________________________ I suggest that you take your request to SI Admin & see what they tell you. I'll be glad to provide them with a factual background replete with links in support of my POV. I'm confident I will make a compelling & factual case. Ö¿Ö

To: im a survivor who wrote (35481)	5/30/2001 3:45:38 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Keith, please get your facts straight. Jim is a good friend of mine. He makes no bones about the fact that he is not perfect. However, I am shocked at your allegations about him. You said of Jim.......... Message 15864206 ""And, in looking at his history of posts, he seems obssesed with members of the opposite sex. That is my opinion based on reading his posts. I mean sheez, for the last year how many posts did he make regarding "hotties" and etc, etc.....Heck, I dont have the time to count...there were that many, and neither he nor anybody else can deny this. It is in writing, here on si, for all to see. "" ____________________________________________________________ In this post you said.......... Message 15857752 ""Additionally, read your posts......you are a womanizer.....you constantly degrade woman and.......sheez.....I am not even going to go into all your troubled posts.....But I really wonder Jim, what your new employer would think after reading all your posts......heck, when you were interviewing, your main thoughts were how many "cuties" were running around the office. When someone asked how your new job was coming, your response of course dealt with the fact that there were far more cuties running around then you anticipated.......your posts make you sound like somebody with some serious troubles concerning woman, and certainly your posts show nothing but disrespect for woman, IMO. I am a male, but I have always felt your disrespect towards woman was ridiculous. You are a classless individual in my opinion. Again Jim....remember, all your posts are public once you post them.......I seriously wonder what your employer would think after reading the last year of your posts....and dont be surprised if they end up doing just that. Me personally, if you were my employee, and I read the last year of your posts, you would be given your walking papers immediately. You come accross as a very spiteful and troubled human being, not to mention your obvious obsession with members of the opposite sex. And yes Jim, you have some sort of problem with woman.....it is very evident in your posts. Frankly, I am surprised you dont catch more flack from the woman here on SI....you deserve it the way you talk about woman."" ____________________________________________________________ Webster defines obsession as, 'a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling; broadly : compelling motivation.' I just reviewed Jim's profile - 80 posts going back to April 22, 2001. I took the time to count. Jim made a total of five references about women in that time. Unfortunately, they were not even close to what you claimed to be true. There is absolutely no persistent preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling regarding women as you have asserted. Here are all of Jim's references to or about women that I found........... # 1170 "you make perfect sense on MFNX just wanted you to hear out my buyout argument money is wicked tight as tight as a British nun's knees and fiberoptic carriers are all crying the same tune" # 13103 "how is my friend the blonde bombshell? does she ask about me at my favorite library?" # 36792 "just an opinion expressed by someone who has been wrong often I think we might be disappointed with a 25 bpt cut next week they must keep something back just like a woman after consecutive romantic interludes" # 36795 "especially me deny me or else I will consume her" # 36865 "as for the new job, it goes well two weeks down, 798 to go more cutiepies at the office than originally noticed" Do you find the above comments spread over 80 posts & 6 weeks persistent & disturbing? Why do you persist in forcing your false perceptions about others on SI? I'm starting to find that your baseless attacks about my peers & myself are becoming persistent & disturbing Keith. Ö¿Ö