SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (3669)5/29/2001 12:18:44 PM
From: Perspective  Respond to of 209892
 
Sorry - there was a long lag between when I typed it and when I remembered to submit it. Sometimes I forget that the first submit is just a preview.

I see us wrapping up a b of 4 of 3 of 3 just now; typical head-fake to minor new lows on the b of 4. Of course, if Smelly gives much more here, I'm going to have to re-think things.

BC



To: AllansAlias who wrote (3669)5/29/2001 12:28:50 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
It would now appear that we are in that 5 of 3 of 3, just about to turn into your 4 of 3, now probably will last the rest of the day. Maybe a good closing ramp in order.

Still don't know how to count that stupid jump at 10AM. Those things always seem to get in the way of perfectly good counts. The last half-hour Friday makes a great 2, with a matching 4 from about 10:30-11:30AM today. I can't tell you how many counts get hosed by little jumps like that, and they don't seem to even end up mattering in the bigger picture. All I can figure is that the short duration should have warned me that it wasn't the 4 of 3 of 3 that I was looking for.

In any event, if 1=5, NDX and Smelly should be just about done with the downside here.

BC



To: AllansAlias who wrote (3669)5/29/2001 12:44:04 PM
From: John Madarasz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
NDX 60 minute h/s meas. 1805

L. shoulder 5/17/01

NDX large rising wedge measures back to reversal lows as well on the 60 minute... A valid formation



To: AllansAlias who wrote (3669)5/29/2001 1:19:31 PM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Is this 5 of 3? Looks more like (to me, anyway) then b of a 4...